Mimicry in communication: when is it a mistake?

    Mimicry in communication: when is it a mistake?

    Until a few years ago, when we started making the
    early studies in the field of non-verbal communication, it was considered that
    when two people are engaged in a very engaging conversation, these
    tended to unconsciously imitate some of the movements that the other makes
    interlocutor.

    In fact, many psychologists claim that the best
    indicator to know how deeply an individual is involved in one
    conversation is to observe if it imitates our gestures. Of course, there are also
    those who ensure that an excellent technique for capturing attention and empathy
    of our interlocutor is precisely to imitate some of his gestures. Anyway, a recent study carried out by the University
    of California, tried to determine whether to really imitate gestures and i
    movement of others is a social technique as assertive as you think or if you can
    on the contrary, having a negative effect on our reputation. In other
    words, a careful observer might think we are less intelligent and
    reliable if it detects that we are imitating the movements of our interlocutor? The researchers asked a group of volunteers
    who watched several videos in which interviews were carried out.
    Some of the participants saw the videos in which the interviewee showed themselves
    cordial while others were shown videos in which the same interviewer
    he acted condescendingly. However, the key difference
    it consisted in the fact that in some videos the interviewee imitated the movements of the interviewee
    (just small gestures like touching a leg or running a hand through your hair)
    while in other videos there was no interaction. After viewing the videos the participants had to
    evaluate the general competence of the interviewer keeping aspects in mind
    like reliability and friendliness. It turned out curious that although on the level
    conscious none of the participants recognized having seen the gestures, these
    they were essential in assessing who was interviewing. When interviewers imitated the movements of
    respondents were considered less competent by the outside observer. For
    to confirm these results, the experiment was repeated but this time
    blurring the video images so that viewers focused more
    on conversation and on gestures. In this case the results were
    totally different. Researchers remind us that social life is a lot
    complex and that, if we wish to maintain certain statuses, we must stay
    particularly beware of who we imitate since a wrong model can cost us
    the loss of credibility. Thus, depending on the context and ours
    goals, social intelligence sometimes lies in not imitating.
    add a comment of Mimicry in communication: when is it a mistake?
    Comment sent successfully! We will review it in the next few hours.